If Not, Why WORK WITH Licensing IN ANY WAY?

Observing another quarterly meeting of California’s Board of Barbering and Cosmetology (BBC), I can’t help but have some strong opinions. In the end, the pressing issues being attended to in this particular get together, like health insurance and safety polices, enforcement types of procedures and unlicensed activity, change how I do business directly. Other members of the audience have their own opinions, and that’s one of the principle advantages of coming to this meeting: the opportunity to share our opinions on the record.

In California, the BBC must store general population meetings to help in accountability and transparency. To help make the meetings even more accessible, they’re webcast and later archived on the BBC website together. Which means the proceedings could be watched by me from the comfort of my home, months later even. Instead, I choose to be present, no matter what’s on the agenda or how far I must travel.

Even whenever I don’t connect on the record, my presence at these meetings demonstrates my commitment to reasonable and fair governance. Those unfamiliar with state regulatory agencies may be disappointed to discover that it’s not the government’s responsibility to promote our profession. We’ve national organizations to the intent, chiefly the Professional Beauty Association (PBA) which also encompasses the National Cosmetology Association (NCA).

As worth it as these organizations are, their influence and resources on talk about governments are qualified. It might be different if there have been national standards, testing, and licensure, but that’s not the case. The known fact is specific state governments protect consumers by regulating us, state by status. To effect how that’s achieved, we are in need of more salon entrepreneurs and licensees to take part at the Hawaii level, rather than depending on others to advocate for us. We realize protecting consumers and promoting our profession are advantageous mutually, then exclusive rather, goals. It only makes sense because strong consumer cover validates our certification, licensure, and the enforcement of rules and regulations, those coping with health and safety especially.

  • Reduce redness
  • Sometimes when you fall you fly
  • Provides deep transdermal penetration; and
  • On the pricier side
  • Not messy to apply like the majority of other anti-ageing lotions

Who easier to protect our hobbies as beauty pros, taxpayers, residents, and consumers in our respected state governments than ourselves? Over the full years, I’ve heard so many complaints about inadequate training, outdated exams, incompetent licensees, infrequent inspections, unfair competition, etc., it makes me speculate if any express board will its job well? If not, why bother with licensing by any means?

Apparently, others have asked the same question and drove who’s wasn’t necessary. Recent proposals in Florida, Indiana, and New Hampshire to deregulate the beauty career have prompted pros to behave vehemently to safeguard their licensing. While that’s encouraging, it’s insufficient. To be a more powerful effect on state, our participation should be long lasting and proactive, not temporary and reactive. In the event the power that is only seen and/or hear from experts under the most extreme circumstances, it diminishes our likely impact. Than merely complain Rather, consider what you can do to help your mother board improve.

We could complete a lot more working collaboratively with this state boards, expressing our support or criticism adequately and respectfully. Creating a collaborative relationship with a state board will begin with reaching out. The web makes this easy; there are numerous online language resources to learn out about future meetings, proposed laws, and other opportunities to contribute, like being a subject matter expert or portion upon an advisory committee.

Your professional knowledge can help your plank develop and use better policies. Interacting right with mother-board personnel and associates will give you opinion on current guidelines, and the reasoning and heritage behind them, whether you acknowledge or not. I’ve concerns (some minimal, others major) about practically every aspect of my status board’s purview: range of practice, safety, and health, curriculum, beauty schools, written and practical examinations, licensing fees, booth rentals, inspections, enforcement and continuing education. There’s plenty of room for improvement, but policies to advance at a much slower rate than our industry does. The constraints (financial, legal, political, etc.) under which talk about boards operate limit their flexibility to improve.

For example, in California, we are in need of more salon inspectors and support personnel desperately and have the money to invest in these positions, but a hiring freeze imposed by our governor makes that difficult, if not impossible, at this right time. If we should be regulated, I demand sensibly be controlled pretty and.

For your individual consciousness and our collective likes and dislikes, You are encouraged by me to find out more on the legislative issues affecting our profession. Write right to the executive officer of your board, the agency overseeing your board, state legislators as well as your governor. Attend mother board conferences and volunteer. Share your ideas and concerns with other beauty professionals through networking, trade publications, and social media.